영유아 교육·보육 통합 데이터 체계 구축 방안

nYDdSO8cmKoEeJB468QVIQ==

연구성과

연구보고서

영유아 교육·보육 통합 데이터 체계 구축 방안 Establishing an Integrated Data System for Early Childhood Education and Care

영유아 교육·보육 통합 데이터 체계 구축 방안원문 다운로드 영유아 교육·보육 통합 데이터 체계 구축 방안원문보기

보고서명
영유아 교육·보육 통합 데이터 체계 구축 방안
보고서명(영문)
Establishing an Integrated Data System for Early Childhood Education and Care

책임자 양미선
소속기관육아정책연구소
내부연구참여자최은영,박은영
외부연구참여자
발행기관 육아정책연구소
ISBN979-11-6865-127-2
출판년도2025
페이지291
보고서유형 기본연구보고서
연구유형 정책
표준분류 교육 > 유아교육
자료유형연구보고서
공공누리유형 4유형 (출처표시+상업적이용금지+변경금지)
주제어영유아 교육·보육 지원 정보 시스템, 영유아 교육·보육 통계, 어린이집·유치원 정보공시, 영유아 교육·보육 통합 통계

조회수

조회수 반영까지 최대 10분 정도 소요될 수 있습니다.

41
다운로드

다운로드 수 반영까지 최대 10분 정도 소요될 수 있습니다.

4

□보육 및 유아교육 통계의 생산과 관련된 법 및 제도 현황을 분석하고, 관련된 국내외 선행연구를 고찰함.
□해외 사례를 검토하고 시사점을 도출함.
□보육 및 유아교육 시스템 구축 현황 및 생산 데이터를 살펴봄.
□어린이집･유치원 정보공시 항목 및 공시 주기 등의 운영 및 이용 현황과 요구를 파악하고, 전문가 대상으로 향후 영유아 교육･보육통합기관 정보공시에 대한 의견을 알아봄.
□보육통계와 유아교육통계 작성 방식(조사방법, 지표, 산출기준 등)을 비교 검토함.
-유아 교육통계와 보육통계 조사(추출) 방법, 지표(항목), 산출기준 등을 비교하고 영유아 교육･보육통합 통계 작성에 대한 전문가 의견을 알아봄.
□영유아 교육･보육 통합 데이터 체계 및 시스템 구축(안)을 마련하고, 영유아 교육･보육 통합 데이터 활용 방안을 제시함.
□기존 보육(어린이집) 및 유아교육(유치원) 분야 데이터 체계 전반에 대한 개선 방안을 함께 제시함.

This study investigates the current landscape of integrated early childhood education and care (ECEC) institutions and proposes a systematic framework for constructing a coherent data architecture capable of supporting evidence-based policymaking. To this end, relevant laws and regulations governing ECEC statistics, prior domestic and international research, and comparative global cases were systematically reviewed. The study further analyzed major information systems and datasets utilized in the childcare and early childhood education sectors, identified discrepancies in data items and calculation criteria, and examined the structure of information disclosure systems for childcare centers and kindergartens. In addition, expert advisory panels composed of scholars and field practitioners were convened, and in-depth interviews were conducted with parents of preschool-aged children.
Drawing on these analyses, the study advances several policy recommendations.
First, given the structural differences between childcare and early childhood education information systems, an immediate transition to a fully integrated ECEC system is not feasible. A phased integration strategy is therefore essential. The proposed strategy includes:
(1) establishing an Integrated Information Disclosure Portal, accompanied by a unified admissions platform essential for enrollment in integrated ECEC institutions (provisionally termed “Early Childhood Schools”);
(2) building an integrated financial accounting system by consolidating regionally operated systems—currently in use in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Chungnam—with the national K-edufine system;
(3) developing a comprehensive ECEC information management system and data warehouse (DW); and
(4) migrating the part-time childcare application and management system, presently linked to the Pregnancy･Childbirth･Parenting Portal, into the integrated ECEC platform.
Second, an information disclosure framework for integrated ECEC institutions must be institutionalized. If the ECEC Integration Act is situated within the Framework Act on Education, only partial amendments to the Act on Special Cases Concerning Disclosure of Information by Educational Institutions would be required. If not, disclosure provisions must be incorporated into the ECEC Integration Act itself. Although integrated ECEC institutions differ in nature from primary and secondary schools, they fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education and local education offices. Thus, from the standpoint of consistency, administrative efficiency, and legal coherence, amending the existing Act on Special Cases Concerning Disclosure of Information by Educational Institutions is the more appropriate legislative approach. A draft set of disclosure items for integrated ECEC institutions was developed with reference to the government’s planned announcement of the Standards for the Establishment and Operation of Integrated ECEC Institutions (Draft) at the December 16, 2024 public hearing and by examining existing disclosure requirements for childcare centers and kindergartens. The disclosure cycle should align with provisions in the Act on Special Cases Concerning Disclosure of Information by Educational Institutions.
Third, the production of integrated ECEC statistics must be legally mandated. The ECEC Integration Act should establish statutory foundations for generating statistics on integrated ECEC institutions. While a survey-based approach, similar to that used for kindergartens, is possible, a system-based method that utilizes administrative data stored directly within information systems—mirroring practices in childcare centers and public kindergartens—is more desirable. This method increases data accuracy, reduces burden on institutions, and enhances overall efficiency in statistical production. If integrated ECEC institutions are incorporated into the school system under the Framework Act on Education, existing educational statistical standards should be applied. Conversely, if they constitute an independent legal category, a distinct set of integrated ECEC statistical indicators must be developed.
Additionally, the ECEC Integration Act should include provisions for a comprehensive conditions survey to assess the status of early childhood education and care. The household component should survey 5,000 households with children aged 0–5, using beneficiaries of parental benefits, home childcare allowances, and ECEC subsidies as the sampling frame. The institutional survey should cover 10% of all provisional Early Childhood Schools as of April 1 of the survey year, with the teacher survey maintaining the same sampling scale. Household surveys will be conducted through in-person interviews; institutional surveys will combine on-site interviews with online responses; and teacher surveys will be administered online. Survey items should build upon existing childcare and kindergarten surveys while incorporating elements aligned with the standards for establishing and operating integrated ECEC institutions.
Finally, revisions to Korea’s education indicators in the OECD Education at a Glance are warranted. The classification of ISCED 0 (early childhood education) program types and the distribution of public and private institutions require reevaluation. As integrated ECEC institutions are expected to include national/public, publicly operated, and private types (general, home-based, and workplace-based), it must be determined whether publicly operated institutions should be classified as public institutions alongside national/public providers.

콘텐츠 큐레이션 : 동일주제 가장 많이 이용된 자료 추천

현재 페이지에서 제공되는 연구보고서에 대하여 평가해 주세요

별점5점만점에 5점 별점5점만점에 4점 별점5점만점에 3점 별점5점만점에 2점 별점5점만점에 1점

의견(0)

연구성과에 따른 의견과 무관한 글, 선정적인 글 및 비방글 등의 게시물은 관리자에 의해 언제든 삭제 조치 될 수 있으며, 주민등록번호 형식 및 연속된 숫자 13자리는 입력할 수 없습니다.

입력 가능 Byte : 4000 Byte 현재 입력 Byte : 0 Byte

자동등록방지 숫자를 순서대로 입력하세요.

NKIS 국가정책연구포털

연구성과

국책연구동향

NKIS 통계

게시판

NKIS소개

연구성과

국책연구동향

NKIS 통계

게시판

NKIS소개

연구성과

연구보고서

영유아 교육·보육 통합 데이터 체계 구축 방안

Establishing an Integrated Data System for Early Childhood Education and Care

국문초록

영문초록

목차

콘텐츠 큐레이션 : 동일주제 가장 많이 이용된 자료 추천

연구보고서

정책연구자료

세미나

현재 페이지에서 제공되는 연구보고서에 대하여 평가해 주세요

의견(0)